What role does architecture play in supporting a second nature?

The Bird Learning Center

Anchorage, Alaska, USA

2011

 

In collaboration with Liz Olberding, James Huemoeller provided pro-bono design services to the Bird TLC organization in Anchorage, Alaska. The non-profit group, whose services include wild bird rehabilitation and children's education programs, owned a lot north of Potter Marsh, about 10 miles south of Anchorage. At the time, the organization was concerned that the current operational costs of the prefabricated structure it rented were putting it at risk of foreclosure by the end of the year. To complete the project within the short Alaskan building season, James, Liz and a local contractor, Nesser Construction Inc., teamed together to develop a design scheme that would reduce the organization’s costs, enhance their offerings to the general public, and provide a foundation for growth in their new home.

The site sat atop a ridge overlooking the marsh, a destination for bird watchers from all over the world due to the diversity of species that frequent it. The project required the reuse of an approved design for the septic system, wells, and traffic control plan. The previous design, completed by another architectural team and which completed the permitting process, could not accommodate phasing, requiring a redesign by our team.

Phasing

One major challenge for the project was finding a coherent design concept that could be applied across the variety of programmatic types over the three phases. The first phase included the administration offices and the rehabilitation centre, the second phase included the learning facilities, and the final phase was a large open space for demonstration and recovery flights. The solution used a traditional shed building form for three separate structures spread across a new campus for the organization. Although the form and exterior finishes would be the same for each building, the structural systems would be designed to meet the specific needs of each program and budget. Minimizing the aesthetic difference between a simple wood-frame structure and a long-span steel-and-CLT structure became an important design consideration for the project. 

Site Design

Another important aspect of this project was the site design, which needed to accommodate visitors to the marsh. Restrooms, picnic tables, and message boards were provided throughout the site. The design team also proposed a parking lot designed to accommodate tent and vehicular campers during slow periods. Within the supporting walls of the shed-roofed buildings were amenities such as restrooms and RV services that also supported visitors. Finally, the design proposed a long path from the site down to an existing boardwalk to connect birders from the marsh viewing area parking lot to the learning centre. A proposed elevated viewing platform at the beginning of the path provided better viewing for birdwatchers and served as a marker within the centre's landscape for visitors.

Most importantly, the design decisions mentioned above were made during a design phase of only a couple of weeks. While the design team recognized the immediate needs of Bird TLC, the project also needed to consider a longer-term plan to ensure that the design decisions for the first phase would not adversely affect later projects. This philosophy was maintained from the site layout to the detailing of the building itself. 


 

 1: clinic & interior pens (phase 1) | 2: exterior cages | 3: visitor information | 4: RV parking and campground | 5: picnic area | 6: learning center & admin (phase 2) | 7: exhibition and training hall (phase 3) | 8: service area | 9: septic field | 10: access to Potters Marsh | 11: service road

 
  • JIM

    James Huemoeller in collaboration with Liz Olberding

Previous
Previous

Genoa Harbor Redevelopment

Next
Next

New Orleans Passive House